UNRECOGNIZED MEDICINE (Part 1)

Recently, the question of trust in modern medicine has become increasingly acute, with its bias towards medications, and ultimately – its service, primarily, to pharmaceutical corporations, rather than to human health, as one would expect. I have tried many times to write an article based on the materials of "New Medicine" by R.G. Hamer, which I found on the internet in 2002 and translated, because my husband was diagnosed with cancer, and he needed to be saved. It seemed that there was nothing complicated in them. However, medical texts have their own specifics, and if this is neglected, it results in yet another journalistic falsehood. I would not want that, not so much for my own reputation, but for the reputation of New Medicine.

Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer conducted extensive research in several areas. Ultimately, he came to understand what disease actually is, why, how, and for what purpose it arises, how it develops and heals. Special attention in his works is given to cancer and serious diseases, which Hamer calls equivalents of cancer, such as heart attack, stroke, and diabetes. He defined the "iron rule of cancer," that is, the mandatory conditions for its occurrence. I had the opportunity to verify this law. I cannot discuss the medical part of the verification, but the psychological part... I did not encounter a single case where the occurrence of cancer was not preceded by some unexpectedly strong stress, shock, or serious loss. Not a single one. And based on which organ was affected, I, like a magician, guessed the reason. The accuracy was about 90%, with deviations in details.

However, all other diseases also fit perfectly into Dr. Hamer's scheme. I provided these materials to doctors – they became defensive. The work I did with my husband before and after the operation allowed us to achieve results that (according to the doctors themselves) are not seen after such operations! Our doctors, to whom I explained everything in a popular manner along the way, acknowledged this, were surprised, rejoiced... and said that "all this is certainly wonderful, but..." I provided these materials to oncologists and radiologists. Agreeing that "artifacts are present," they found errors in the text. Surely there are errors in it – I am not a doctor or a translator, and moreover, this is a double translation, from German to English, and then to Russian. The system works, check it. But they are not interested.

In one medical textbook that I had to study in connection with my husband's illness, almost every description of a disease began with the words "the etiology is unknown," or "the etiology is unclear." (Etiology – the causes of a disease or pathological condition). And if it is clear, then, as a rule, the infection is to blame. And how do doctors treat if they do not know the causes? However, they do not so much treat as cut. They save – yes, undoubtedly, but do not heal. For it is impossible to heal (that is, to make whole) by cutting. But that is just the tip of the iceberg. The real trouble fell to Dr. Hamer. Even those hospitals that initially showed interest in his work soon withdrew their support. He insisted – he was persecuted. He taught others – and his students apply his method in secret. They achieve excellent results, but do not publicize the method.

Special commissions conducting checks do not "confirm" the effectiveness of the method, and prove that it "has no value" for treating patients. He was excommunicated from medicine, the old man was imprisoned. The doctor himself became a staunch anti-Semite – he faced resistance from the medical-pharmaceutical mafia, and considering that 75% of chemotherapy drugs are produced by Israeli corporations, it is clear why.

Hamer's method leaves no room for chemotherapy in cancer treatment; moreover – it asserts that it causes much more harm than good (which directly intersects with the vaccination discussions of today – they are of the same ilk). In general, in the sad story of Dr. Hamer and his New Medicine, the entire essence of the so-called healthcare system is reflected like in a drop of water.

GERMAN NEW MEDICINE by Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The interview was intended as an introduction to the "NEW MEDICINE" of Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer and his books "CANCER, THE DISEASE OF THE SOUL" [1984] and "THE HERITAGE OF NEW MEDICINE - the ontogenetic system of tumors, including cancer, leukemia, psychosis, and epilepsy" [1987]. – Dr. Hamer, what prompted you to research cancer and create a connection between the soul and disease? – I really did not deal with this until 1978. I was a doctor of internal medicine and worked for fifteen years in university clinics, five as a professor. I also had my own private practice for several years before 1978.

Then a terrible thing happened: my son Dirk, who was sleeping in a boat, was shot, for no reason, by a mad Italian prince. This was a terrible blow for me, sudden and unexpected, and I was powerless to do anything. Everyday events or conflicts usually do not catch us so "unprotected." We generally have the opportunity to foresee ordinary conflicts that we encounter in life, but conflicts to which we cannot prepare, and which leave us helpless and unable to react, essentially create panic shock. We call them biological conflicts.

In 1978, I developed testicular cancer precisely from such a biological conflict, the so-called "loss conflict." Since I had never been seriously ill before, I wondered whether my condition had anything to do with my son's death. Three years later, as I was the chief therapist in the gynecology-oncology clinic of Munich University, I had the opportunity to study women who had developed cancer and compare the results to see if the mechanism was the same as mine; whether they had experienced the same terrible blow. I found that all of them, without exception, had experienced the same type of biological conflict as I did.

They recalled the shock, which ended with insomnia, weight loss, cold hands, and the onset of tumor growth. At that time, my point of view was very different from all current medical concepts, and when I presented these findings to my colleagues, they gave me an ultimatum: either renounce my results or leave the clinic immediately. – This is reminiscent of the Middle Ages! How did you react? – I could not deny what I believed to be the truth, so of course, I left. This unfair dismissal caused me another biological conflict, and I lost my self-confidence. I vividly remember my distress and disappointment at being expelled from the clinic for presenting well-researched, indisputable, and new scientific knowledge. I did not think such a thing was possible. It was very traumatic, and I had a difficult time researching the last two hundred patients. I finished my studies, however, on the last day, IRC (IRON RULE OF CANCER) – THE IRON RULE OF CANCER – was born. – Perhaps you can explain in simple terms what the essential criteria of IRC are? IRC is a biological law. It has three criteria. The first is that every cancer or disease equivalent to cancer develops with DHS. This is a very serious, highly acute, dramatic, and isolating shock of conflict occurrence, which is registered simultaneously on three levels: • in the soul • in the brain • in the organ. DHS – "Dirk Hamer Syndrome." I named it that because the shock of my son's death was the cause of my testicular cancer.

This DHS has since become the main focus of New Medicine. In every case of disease, we must diligently find the DHS, with all its variables. We must mentally return to the specifics of its occurrence to understand why the person was affected by the situation before the biological conflict arose; find the reason why it was so traumatic; why there was no one to discuss it with, and why it was a problem.

A good doctor must be able to place themselves in the soul of an infant, an embryo, an old person, a young girl, or even an animal. They must place themselves in the actual time of the DHS. Only then will they be able to detect the biological conflict and distinguish it from hundreds of other problems. – IRC has two more criteria... – Yes. The second criterion is that the content of the conflict during the DHS is determined, firstly, by HH, which has a specific location in the brain, and secondly, by the location of the cancer or cancer equivalent in the organs of the body. Each conflict has a very specific content that is determined precisely at the moment of the DHS occurrence. The determination of the content of the conflict is "associative," i.e., it occurs subconsciously and therefore bypasses our conscious understanding. A typical example: a "water" or "liquid" conflict would arise from an accident where a truck driver lost all the gasoline, or a milkman lost all his milk.

The association with liquid causes a related biological conflict, which is registered as a specific disease – kidney cancer. (I would add: anything that flows can be associated with liquid. If we say that money is slipping through our fingers – the loss of money can cause a "liquid" conflict). – But then does this mean that the content of each conflict pertains to a specific type of cancer and is registered in a specific area of the brain? – Yes, a very specific relay in the brain. In the case of kidney cancer caused by a "water" or "liquid" case, a short circuit occurs at the moment of the DHS in a predetermined place in the brain, causing a problem in the right or left kidney, depending on the situation. This short circuit can be recorded by a brain CT scan and resembles concentric rings on a target, or the picture of the surface of water into which a stone has been thrown. Radiologists mistakenly take this phenomenon for a defect in the equipment. This brain relay is called HH. By the way, this name was given by my opponents, who mockingly called these areas "Hamersche Herde" – "Hamer's funny spots." – And what is the third criterion of IRC? – The third criterion is that the development of the conflict corresponds to the specific development of HH in the brain and a very specific development of cancer or cancer-equivalent disease in the organ. In other words, this biological conflict strikes at three levels simultaneously: the soul, the brain, and the organ. It is now evident and has been proven that the development of the conflict is synchronized at all three levels. The main point here is a specific system in the most serious scientific sense, because if you know the exact location of any of the levels, the other two can be found and manifested.

This means that we have an organism, which we can think of in three levels, but actually – it is a whole. The next story is an example: after a lecture in Vienna in May 1991, a doctor handed me a brain CT scan of a patient and asked me to explain what the health condition of this person was and what conflict it was determined by. Twenty colleagues were present, including several radiologists and CT specialists. From the three levels, I had before me only the level of the brain. After reviewing the CT scan, I diagnosed fresh bleeding bladder cancer in the healing stage, old prostate cancer, diabetes, old lung cancer, and sensory paralysis of a specific area of the body, and of course, the corresponding conflicts. The doctor stood up and said, "Congratulations, Mr. Hamer! Five diagnoses and five hits. This is exactly what the patient has, and you were even able to distinguish what he is suffering from now from what he suffered from before. Fantastic!" One of the radiologists said: "From this moment on, I am convinced of your method. How were you able to guess fresh bleeding bladder cancer? I found nothing when reviewing the CT scan, but now that you have shown us the relay, I can draw conclusions." – Can we talk a little about the mental level? How can I find out if I received a shock that could have caused cancer? How to determine this? – There are very specific signs that clearly distinguish conflicts from problems in our daily lives. From the moment of the DHS, the patient experiences continuous tension in the sympathetic nervous system. Signs will include cold hands and/or feet, loss of appetite, weight loss, insomnia, and worrying day and night about the conflict. This situation only changes when the patient resolves the conflict.

In the process of the biological conflict, we can see the patient entering prolonged stress, which causes specific symptoms and tumor growth. HH in the brain, which appears immediately, shows that the patient's soul has very precisely recognized and identified signs that cannot be missed. – What happens when such a biological conflict is resolved? – At the point where the biological conflict is resolved, we can see very clear signs at the mental level, in the brain, and at the organ level. At the mental and vegetative level, we see that the patient no longer experiences the content of the conflict. The hands suddenly become warm again, appetite improves, weight normalizes, and the patient sleeps better. Fatigue and weakness may also arise, along with a need to rest. This is in no way the "beginning of the end"; on the contrary, it is a very positive sign. The duration of the healing stage varies depending on the duration of the preceding conflict.

At the peak of the healing stage, when the body retains a lot of water, we see an epileptoid crisis or epileptoid seizure, which shows unique symptoms of each disease. After the epileptoid crisis, the body removes water and slowly returns to normal as the patient's strength is restored. At the brain level, we see the healing stage of HH, which in the active stage of the conflict had the shape of a round target, and now shows swelling. We can see on the CT scan how the rings of HH darken and blur, as if the entire relay at this point swells for a time. This epileptoid crisis, which is actually triggered by the brain, also marks a high degree of swelling and, accordingly, a turning point towards normal. In the second half of the healing stage, the safe connective tissue of the brain, glia, fills HH for repair. This truly safe connective tissue, which we can stain white on the CT scan with iodine contrast, was previously mistakenly diagnosed as a brain tumor and operated on. Since brain cells themselves cannot multiply after birth, real brain tumors cannot exist. At the organ level, we see that tumor growth stops.

This means that the biological conflict has been resolved – we call it "conflictolysis" – the dissolution of the conflict. This is a very important observation for us, which, in a sense, programs future therapy. At the organ level, we see very distinct beneficial improvements, which we will discuss later. Even the epileptoid crisis can be observed at three levels (soul, brain, and organ). – Can you describe such an epileptoid crisis? An epileptoid crisis is something that Mother Nature invented a billion years ago. It occurs at all three levels simultaneously. The meaning and purpose of the crisis, which occurs at the peak of the healing stage, is to return to normal. What we call an epileptic convulsive spasm with muscle cramps is only one form of an epileptoid crisis, namely, after the resolution of a motor conflict. Epileptoid crises occur in every disease with some differences in each case. Mother Nature has created a real trick for this purpose. In the middle of the healing stage, the patient experiences a repetition of the psychological conflict, i.e., the patient relives their conflict again for a short time – with cold hands and abundant cold sweat. This happens so that the brain swelling can be suppressed and eliminated, and the patient can return to normal. After the epileptoid crisis, the patient becomes warm again and then experiences the first urinary stage. From this epileptoid crisis, the patient returns to normal, and further shocks of the conflict do not hinder the healing process.

The second urinary stage occurs at the end of the healing stage when the body eliminates the remaining swelling. The dangerous point lies just before the end of the epileptoid crisis when it becomes clear whether this was enough to turn the disease back. The best-known epileptoid crisis is a heart attack. Others include pulmonary embolism, hepatitis, or lung infection. – Could you describe some typical conflicts and explain why you call them "biological conflicts"? – The reason we call them biological conflicts is that the historical development must be understood and an analogy found as to how similar conflicts occur in humans and animals. They have nothing to do with our intellectual or psychological conflicts or problems.

These conflicts are of a fundamentally different quality. They are, by nature, embedded in the archaic behavioral program of our brain. You think you think. In reality, the conflict has already associatively struck you a fraction of a second before you even begin to think. For example, when a wolf hunts a young lamb, the mother of the lamb will experience a maternal-child conflict just as a human mother would. She will develop breast cancer on the same side that a human mother would develop breast cancer. The side depends on whether the person is left- or right-handed, or in the case of animals, left- or right-footed. The HH of the maternal-child conflict "nesting territory" will be located in the same place in the mother's brain, and as a relay for maternal-child "kinship." The HH for the child-mother conflict, especially the "sucking conflict," will be in the same place in the baby's brain as the relay for child-mother "kinship."

All our biological conflicts can be categorized according to this historical development. We know that during our historical development, these rare or unusual events and their consequences were programmed, and that is why not only harmonizing organs and brain areas but even those in contradiction, due to historical development, became interconnected. All these soul-related troubles lie historically and organically very close to each other in our brain. They even have the same histological cellular structure. We can see such remarkable order in nature as soon as we learn to look at our organism through the prism of its historical development. – Could you give some examples from life? – Yes. Suppose a mother is holding her child’s hand, standing on the sidewalk and chatting with a neighbor. The child breaks free and runs into the street. The screech of brakes is heard – the child is hit by a car. The mother was not prepared for this and found herself completely defenseless. She freezes in shock. The child lies in the hospital and is in critical condition for several days. The mother’s hands become icy, she cannot sleep or eat, and experiences constant tension, from which a lump begins to grow in her left breast if she is right-handed. She is experiencing a typical maternal-child conflict, with targeted formation in the right cerebellum. When the child returns home, and the doctors say, "You are lucky, the child is healthy again," the mother’s hands will warm up, and the conflict resolution stage will begin; she will sleep better and her appetite will return. This is a typical conflict that has the same consequences in both humans and animals.

Another example: a woman catches her husband in bed with her best friend. She will experience a conflict of sexual frustration. In biological terms – a copulation conflict, which will cause cancer of the uterus in a right-handed woman. It is not necessary that each would experience such a conflict in the same situation. For example, if the woman did not love her husband and was thinking about divorce, she would not perceive this shock as a sexual conflict, but rather as a human conflict due to a lack of unity in the family. This would then be a partner conflict, which could cause cancer of the right breast if the woman was right-handed. So it turns out that the same case will have different psychological significance for each individual. The decisive outcome is not what happened, but how the patient experienced the experience at the psychological moment of the DHS. The same case could also turn out to be a conflict of disgust, causing hypoglycemia (abnormally low blood sugar), if the woman caught her husband in a very ugly situation, possibly with a prostitute. Or it could bring a feeling of self-inadequacy if the woman caught her husband with a girl twenty years younger. The feeling then could be "I cannot compete" or "I cannot offer him what she can." In that case, it would be a skeleton, the pubic bone of the pelvis would be affected, where one could see osteolysis (calcium deficiency) as a sign of a feeling of sexual inadequacy. You must know all this to find out what the patient was thinking during the DHS, because this happens at the same moment when the path is laid for the further development of the disease.

This path draws a very essential picture because all possible obstacles and residual problems will depend on this single case. We can even speak here of an allergy to conflict. – Dr. Hamer, is IRC sufficient for anyone to treat patients? – In principle, yes, but IRC is only the first law of the biological process of New Medicine. Overall, we have four biological processes that I found empirically, which means that they can now be seen in 15,000 collected and registered cases. If you work diligently, you need to investigate all four biological processes. – Let’s go in order. What is the second law of the biological process that you found? – The second biological law of New Medicine is the fact that every disease has two stages.

– All diseases? Not just cancer? – Yes, all diseases have this dual phase – "cold" and "hot." In the past, doctors dealt with 1,000 diseases but did not realize this dual phase. 500 of them were "cold" diseases, in which the patient's blood vessels are narrowed, leading to pallor and weight loss. The other 500 were "hot" diseases with fever caused by dilated blood vessels. They generate fatigue but not loss of appetite. It was believed that these "hot" diseases were separate diseases. According to our current understanding, simply 500 diseases have two stages. The first is always the "cold" active stage of conflict with tension in the sympathetic nervous system, and the second, if the conflict is resolved, is always the "hot" stage of recovery and healing. Of course, HH for these two stages is in the same place in the brain, so you can consider it the same HH. In the active stage of conflict, a CT scan shows a clear ring target, and in the healing stage, the rings break down into swelling. From this example, we see that this biological law is important not only for cancer but for all of medicine. Even an old deer that is pushed out of its territory by a young deer will be in prolonged tension, experiencing a biological conflict; namely, a territorial conflict with HH behind the right ear in the brain. The deer attacks, wishing only to reclaim its territory. It does not eat, does not sleep, it loses weight and suffers a heart spasm or angina. Organically speaking, it has ulcers, which means it has small abscesses in the coronary artery. It attacks the younger deer because that is the only way to expel the competitor from its territory.

After this action, it will enter a prolonged healing stage – vagotonia. Its extremities will warm up again, it will eat again, and will be very tired. At the peak of the healing stage, it will experience a heart attack as an epileptoid crisis. If it survives, it will be able to hold its territory. In the animal world, this happens just as it does in humans. For a human, their territory would be their farm, their own business, family, or workplace. We have shares of several territories; even a car can be a territory. For humans, a heart attack will be serious only if the conflict has continued for at least three or four months; however, if the conflict has continued for more than a year, and the beginning of the second stage has been missed, it is usually fatal. A CT scan is a very quick way to diagnose this. One might ask why doctors did not discover this law of two stages long ago, as it is so obvious. The answer today is as simple as it was difficult before. If the conflict is not resolved, the disease remains in the first stage, meaning that the individual remains in the active stage of conflict, losing weight all the time, and finally dies from neurasthenia or exhaustion. The law of two stages applies to all diseases only where the individual can resolve the conflict. However, this law applies to every disease and, accordingly, to every conflict, because, in principle, every conflict can be resolved in one way or another. – Dr. Hamer, what is the third biological law that you found? – This is the ontogenetic system of cancer equivalents and tumors.

– What does the technical term "ontogenetic" mean? – "Ontogenetic" means that all diseases in medicine derive from the historical development of humans. – How did you discover this? – I discovered the ontogenetic system of tumors and cancer equivalents after observing approximately 10,000 cases. I worked only empirically, as a good scientist should.

I registered all collected cases, CT scans with their histological results. Only after that did I put them all together and compare them. I saw that there is a system. It was exciting, especially since we never thought it was possible. There were many patients whose compact tumors grew with an increase in cells in the active stage of conflict (or sympatheticotonia), but others grew something in the healing stage (or vagotonia) after the conflict was resolved (conflictolysis). This could not possibly be the same disease. Thus, there were two types of cellular growth: • in the first – cell growth in the active stage of conflict; and • in the second – cell growth in the healing stage. Diseases that have decreasing cells or cell shrinkage (holes, necrosis, or ulcers) in the active stage have an increase in cells in the healing stage. I compared these different results and could always see the system. Tumors that formed cellular growth in the active stage of conflict always had relays simultaneously in the medulla oblongata and the cerebellum. These two parts of the brain together are called the "old brain." Therefore, all cancers that initiate cellular growth in the active stage of conflict have their relays, their HH, from which they receive guidance, in the "old brain." And all cancers that create cellular growth or so-called tumors (but have holes, ulcers, or necrosis in the active stage of conflict) always receive signals from their relays from the cerebral cortex. This systematic connection was discovered in 1987 and named the "ontogenetic system of tumors and cancer equivalents." With the iron rule of cancer and the rule of two stages of all diseases, the very first systematic classification of New Medicine was created. "Ontogenesis" means "the origin and individual development of an organism." "Ontogenetic" means "related to the individual development of an organism."

Thus, the ontogenetic system of tumors suggests that neither the location of HH in the brain nor the type of tumor or necrosis that subsequently develops arises randomly, but because everything was logically predetermined in the historical development of humans. It is believed that ontogenesis is a brief repetition of phylogenesis (evolutionary development of an organism or groups of organisms), which means that the development of different species up to humans is repeated in the embryonic development of a child and during infancy. We know that during embryonic development, three primitive cellular layers are created, and the very first development of the embryo and all organs occurs from these three primitive cellular layers: • The inner layer of cells or endoderm; • The middle layer of cells or mesoderm; and • The outer layer of cells or ectoderm. Each cell and each organ in our body can be traced back to connections with one of these cellular layers. Organs that develop from the inner layer of cells have relays or control zones in the medulla oblongata, the oldest part of the brain. In cases of cancer, they produce cellular growth with compact tumors of the adenocellular type. Cells corresponding to organs that developed from the outer cellular layer have relays or control zones in the cerebral cortex, the youngest part of our brain. In cases of cancer, they all cause cell reduction in the form of abscesses or ulcers, or they sacrifice function at the organic level, similar to diabetes or paralysis. In the middle cellular layer, we must differentiate between the older and younger group. Cells corresponding to organs that belong to the older group of the middle cellular layer have relays in the cerebellum, which means they still belong to the "old brain" and therefore produce compact tumor growth of the adenoma cell type in the active stage of conflict. Cells corresponding to organs that belong to the younger group of middle cellular layers have their control zone in the layer of brain substance.

They therefore, in cases of cancer in the active stage of conflict, produce necrosis or holes in the tissue, holes in the bones, spleen, kidneys, or ovaries, called bone, splenic, renal osteolysis or ovarian necrosis. From this, it is clear that cancer is not a senseless development of wildly proliferating cells. It is a comprehensible and even predictable formation that precisely corresponds to the ontogenetic system. – Growth is not the same as growth. Perhaps you could explain the differences in growth in certain diseases? – Yes, this is precisely why they have not been able to discover a system in the formation of cancer until now. According to the existing school of medicine, which I now call "the medicine of students," there is a classification that has no systematic connection. People say there is cancer when cells produce growth that exceeds limits, but we can now see that cells can cause different excessive growth in various phases – both in the active stage of conflict and in the healing stage. For example, a patient has a "stomach upset" conflict, as if he half-swallowed a large piece but cannot digest it. Let’s say he bought a house and suddenly discovered that the sales contract was invalid, that he was deceived and lost the house. From this, he could develop gastric carcinoma, but also growth in the stomach of cells similar to cauliflower, called adenocarcinoma. This cancer occurs in the active stage of conflict with HH on the right side of the medulla oblongata, which is the oldest part of the brain, in the so-called "bridge." Another example: a patient experiences a conflict with water, liquid, or their equivalent. While swimming in the ocean, a young man gets tired, nearly drowns, but is saved at the last minute. For months he thinks about how he almost drowned and cannot even approach water. He suffers from kidney cancer – necrosis of the parenchyma, and he develops cell decay (necrosis) in the kidney parenchyma, during which the kidney can no longer function.

Years later, he takes a vacation and goes to the sea with his family. Since his daughter loves water, he joins her in the sea; by doing this, he resolves his conflict. In the healing stage, a large kidney cyst grows, an increase in cells. This cyst hardens with a kind of connective tissue that helps the kidney in its work. And so we find the initial cause for the tumor. These cancer formations or tumors are by no means senseless; on the contrary, they are quite useful for something. As in our example, when a large piece is swallowed and cannot be digested, the organism produces a powerful tumor. This tumor grew because the digestive and intestinal cells produced a lot of digestive juice to digest the piece. The same reasons can be observed in the case of a kidney cyst, which built a sort of large new kidney that could work again. This is the reason for the various tumors that we could not discern before. We can now accurately differentiate them and distinguish them in the brain according to histological formation and conflicts. All these connections are summarized in this ontogenetic system of tumors and cancer equivalents. Every disease known to medicine develops according to these four biological laws. They can be verified and reproduced thanks to this ontogenetic system of tumors and cancer equivalents. In the same stage, the phenomena in the soul and in the brain are the same, but at the organic level, they differ. Here we see the old brain managing the organs so that in the active stage of conflict they produce cell growth, while the cerebral cortex regulates the organs in such a way that in the active stage of conflict, holes, necroses, ulcers, or cell decay are formed.

In the healing stage, they act in the opposite way. In the healing stage, the old brain manages the organs to destroy tumors with the help of special microorganisms, while the cerebral cortex in the healing stage directs the work of the organs to fill holes and ulcers with viruses and bacteria, increasing in size. – I assume we have approached the fourth law? – Yes, to the ontogenetic system of microorganisms. – Dr. Hamer, what role do microorganisms play in your system? What is their connection with the immune system? – Until now, we thought that microorganisms cause infectious diseases. This view seemed correct since we found microorganisms in every infection. But in reality, this is not true. The entire immune system is just a mirage built on a hypothesis. In curable diseases, we also forgot or missed the first stage, the active stage of conflict. Only after the conflict is resolved do microorganisms become active. In fact, they are directed and activated by our brain. They are NOT our enemies; they help us and work at the behest of our organism. Since they are directed by our brain, they help us destroy cancer tumors after their task is completed, or through bacteria and viruses create holes, necroses, and tissue damage, managed by other parts of the brain. They are our loyal helpers, our "guest workers"! The concept of the immune system as an army that fights against bad microorganisms is simply incorrect. – This connection leads to pulmonary tuberculosis, I dare to argue. How could all those people who had to stay in sanatoriums fifty years ago cure their pulmonary tuberculosis? – If we set aside pulmonary tuberculosis for now and focus on real pulmonary tuberculosis, we can say that pulmonary tuberculosis has always been a healing stage after previously developed lung cancer.

Lung cancer is always a conflict of life-threatening danger and is always managed by our medulla oblongata. It grows in the active stage of conflict but decreases in the healing stage thanks to mycobacteria and tuberculosis bacteria; if any of these bacteria are present, the patient will cough, often with bloody saliva, called sputum, which frightens people and brings them new fears for their lives, so doctors fall into a vicious circle. As an example, one can take how this happens in animals; lung tumors are coughed up and cavities (caverns) remain, which allow for better breathing than before; but if the tuberculosis bacteria are absent, the formation will remain. (This point provokes particularly strong protests from doctors, so I will repeat – this may be a mistake of double translation, an inaccurate transmission of thought – please do not nitpick :) Today, at the end of these decades, we still find some of the old lung formations, although they are inactive because they can no longer grow. Previously, we saw cavities, empty tuberculomas, because the tuberculosis bacillus was everywhere. – Dr. Hamer, perhaps we can approach the practical therapy of conflicts. Is treatment through conversation your first step? – In fact, I would not say so. We do not need treatment through conversation as practiced in psychotherapy, but of course, we must discuss the problem. Let’s look again at the animal world. An animal can survive only by truly resolving the conflict. A deer will be able to survive only if it reclaims its territory. A mother who has had her offspring taken away can survive only if she gets her offspring back. Mother Nature has such a built-in mechanism that allows a mother to quickly have new offspring and resolve her conflict. We must resolve our conflicts as practically and as realistically as animals do. A man whose wife has left him must either get his wife back or find another woman. A deer needs to reclaim its territory or find another territory. The final solution is the best solution. If this is not possible, we must try to use therapeutic conversation as a second option. Traditional therapy that has been used up to today has been "Take this remedy, it will calm you down." (At this point, I do not agree with Dr. Hamer.

Modern psychotherapy has means to resolve biological conflicts without "returning the wife." My own experience confirms this. Another matter is that it should be a joint effort of the doctor and the psychotherapist, there should be medical control over the patient's condition, not running away from the doctor to the psychologist. This method implies full responsibility of the patient themselves, their readiness for the difficult work of the soul. And of course, such work requires not only the highest professionalism of both the doctor and the psychotherapist but also their mutual trust. Difficult, but possible!) Mother Nature created the stage of tension not without purpose, as only in tension will the individual be able to resolve their conflict. To give the patient the opportunity to resolve their conflict, this tension must be activated. If you gave a sedative to a deer, it would be unable to fight and reclaim its territory; instead, it would be deprived of the ability to drive away any unwanted guest. In psychiatry, one can observe how patients who have been given sedatives often become chronic patients. Their natural ability to resolve their conflicts has been taken away from them, resulting in some of them having to live the rest of their lives in psychiatric wards. – Dr. Hamer, how can one therapeutically work with the four biological laws that you discovered? – We must imagine that the patient has three levels: the soul, the brain, and the organ, which together make up the organism. In new therapy, one must think in terms of these three levels or their continuations.

First of all, it is necessary to find the DHS (shock of conflict) and, if possible, the content of the conflict at all three levels. One must work very diligently and carefully. For example, one should consider who the patient is – right-handed or left-handed, to determine which of the two hemispheres of the brain is dominant. We must establish the hormonal situation: is the woman of childbearing age, is she pregnant? Is she taking contraceptive pills that block hormone production in the ovary, or is she in menopause? The same is true for men: hormonal changes lead to a change in the dominant hemisphere of the brain, so a woman taking hormonal contraceptives reacts in a masculine way, with masculine characteristics. A woman taking hormonal contraceptives to a situation where her husband leaves her, leaving her territory, will react with a territorial conflict. We do not search for the conflict only at the level of the soul; we should determine the exact localization in the brain according to the stage of conflict we are in at the moment of the anamnesis (the patient describing their history) and make a check. HH in the brain must correlate exactly with the cancer of the organ. Each specific localization in the brain corresponds to a very specific organ of the body and vice versa. The conflict can only be resolved starting from the soul, from understanding what the real problem underlying the conflict is. A child of a mother who has had an accident must become healthy again. A person who has had a territorial conflict due to job loss must either find another job or retire, join a club, or devote their time to a hobby. There are many possible solutions for each conflict. In nature, solutions are built-in. For example, when a sheep has its lamb taken away, the sheep resolves the conflict by giving birth to another lamb. In humans too – pregnancy has absolute priority from the third month on – no cancer can continue to grow since pregnancy has absolute priority.

We experience most complications at the brain level when swelling develops as a sign of healing. It is necessary to monitor the brain pressure of patients so that they do not fall into a coma. In difficult cases, patients should consume little liquid, protect their heads, and avoid direct sunlight. In the case of unilateral swelling – one should not lie on the side where there is swelling. At the organic level, what doctors saw as a tumor, whether in the active stage of conflict or in the healing stage, was always removed. At this level, we now have a new perspective for the future. If the conflict is resolved, this will be an argument against surgery or radiation, and only then, if the growth bothers the patient mechanically, for example, a large kidney cyst or a large enlargement of the spleen that developed after splenic necrosis in the healing stage. (Splenic necrosis was the organic reflection of bleeding and conflict damage with a reduction in platelets in the active stage of conflict.) This means we must shuffle the cards again. With our knowledge of New Medicine, we must consider: what needs to continue to be done, what is still necessary, and what should no longer be done? If a patient today has the choice to either operate on an intestinal tumor or not – when the patient knows that the conflict has been resolved, and the tumor is more than likely never to grow back, they will say, in 99.9% of cases: "Doctors, if this will not bother me for the next thirty or forty years, I choose this chance; leave everything where it is." – Dr. Hamer, could you explain why IRC is called the "iron" law? – It is called "iron" because it is a biological law. For example, a child will always have a father and a mother, there will always be two participants who create a child. Thus, we have in New Medicine four biological laws: • IRC (IRON RULE OF CANCER) • The law of two stages of all diseases • The ontogenetic system of tumors and diseases equivalent to cancer • The ontogenetically dependent system of microorganisms. All these laws are as iron as IRC. All laws, in a strong or truly scientific sense, matter in reproduction: verifying each successful case. When a biological law is in place, it is expressed not only in that the rule exists but also in that something follows from it. This does not mean that someone programs it, as in mathematically calculated debits and credits. What is important here is that the organism programs it. There is programming of conflict resolution (conflictolysis), when therapy will follow automatically, or – the inability to program conflict resolution, that is, the conflict remains unresolved, as an individual possibility, according to the same law. This strict law is the reason why the "Iron Rule of Cancer" got its name. – Dr. Hamer, what significance does the factor of time have, especially concerning complications that are typical in the healing stage? – The patient will naturally ask the doctor how long they will have to be ill to recover. If one works carefully and finds the DHS, as well as the moment of conflict resolution, it is possible to calculate how long the conflict lasted. With a good anamnesis, one can also find out how intense the content of the conflict was.

Knowing the time and intensity, one can assess the mass of the conflict. Ninety percent of patients usually have no complications in the healing stage. But ten percent – those who had a high-intensity conflict that lasted a long time will have a large mass of conflict that will manifest only after the conflict is resolved. These complications appear in the form of swelling in the brain and especially in the form of an epileptic or epileptoid crisis within the healing stage. It is important to know these complications, as they can sometimes lead to death. However, we can save these lives by preparing to counteract some of the complications during the healing stage with medications, especially cortisone. The most important factor in all this is that the patient knows about the possible complications and has complete confidence that the doctor understands the entire process of the disease, because only then will he or she have a completely different and relaxed attitude towards the disease. The doctor will know the active stage of conflict and the stage of conflict resolution and will therefore be able to direct the course of therapy accordingly depending on the situation or circumstances. Thus, a great trust will be established between the patient and the doctor. Thanks to the knowledge of New Medicine, it is less likely that the patient will panic if the doctor says they have purulent tonsillitis. What is purulent tonsillitis? This is the healing stage after adenocarcinoma of the tonsil. Usually, however, the following happens: after taking samples from the patient's tonsils, the doctor informs them that they have tonsil cancer, which is true, but the likely outcome, if the patient does not know New Medicine, will be that they will fall into complete panic. This panic may be responsible for a new shock of conflict – for example, "panic fear of cancer" or "panic fear of death" – which will cause a new cancer, which, based on this, will confirm the doctor's first diagnosis. What happens in the animal world? We know very few manifestations of so-called metastases.

A professor from Austria presented it this way: Dr. Hamer calls us all abnormal; he says that animals are lucky that they do not understand doctors, and that is why they do not get metastases. – Dr. Hamer, do you assert that metastases do not exist? – Absolutely! What the uninformed doctor sees is new cancer, and in connection with this, a new shock of conflict arises. First due to his diagnosis and prognosis. The tale of metastases is a story of an unstudied and unproven hypothesis. (This assertion also provokes the fury of doctors. But several conversations with pathologists have convinced me that Hamer is probably right. By the way, it is pathologists who have shown the greatest interest in Dr. Hamer's work. But they, alas, do not treat...) Never has there been a scientist-oncologist who noticed cancer cells in the arterial blood of a cancer patient, which could be found there if they were supposed to float in the peripheral parts of the body. The hypothetical idea that cancer cells transform in an unobserved journey through the blood – that is, intestinal cancer cells that grow compact tumors in the intestine suddenly wander into the bones, where they turn into decaying bone cells – is madness that can only arise from some medieval dogmatism. The ontogenetic system denies any possibility that a cell, managed by the old brain in such a way as to produce compact tumors, could suddenly leave its corresponding brain relay and connect with the younger brain and become a decaying bone cell. One can only speculate, but probably eighty percent of all cases of the occurrence of second and third cancers begin in patients due to medical pseudo-therapy. – Dr. Hamer, what role do carcinogenic substances play, and can healthy food prevent or hinder cancer? – Carcinogenic substances do not exist! Scientists have experimented on many animals and have never found anything that causes cancer.

The next idiotic experiment was conducted with rats: for a whole year, concentrated formaldehyde, a substance they usually avoid, was sprayed into the rats' noses. Poor animals developed cancer of the mucous membranes in their noses. They did not get it from formaldehyde, but because they could not stand formaldehyde and ended up with DHS, a biological conflict, because they did not want to smell this substance! It is also known that organs whose nerve connections with the brain have been interrupted cannot produce cancer. However, more than 1,500 supposedly carcinogenic substances have been found through unnecessary experiments on animals. This does not mean that these substances are not toxic to us, but they do not cause cancer, at least without the mediation of our brain. Until today, it has been believed that cancer is the result of wildly proliferating cells of the organ. The assumption that smoking or aniline causes cancer – all this is pure hypothesis that has never been proven and cannot be demonstrated. On the contrary, one experiment with 6,000 hamsters confined to cigarette smoke and 6,000 hamsters that remained free of smoke for six years showed that everything is the opposite. The animals confined to smoke lived longer. The experimenters overlooked the fact that hamsters are not afraid of smoke, as they live underground, and nature saw no need for a coded warning signal in their brains. (My favorite example, these "smoking hamsters"!) With domestic mice – on the contrary; they will flee in complete deadly panic from any smoke. In the Middle Ages, there was a superstition that if you see many mice running away from a house, it means there is a fire in the house. In domestic mice, lung cancer can be caused by sudden panic fear due to smoke. These examples are intended to demonstrate that all experiments on animals conducted today are only torture for them and nothing more, because no one thinks that an animal has a soul.

In conclusion, there is absolutely no evidence that carcinogenic substances act directly on organs, bypassing the brain. – What is the danger of radioactive radiation? – Radioactive radiation caused by the Chernobyl disaster indiscriminately destroys cells, but especially primitive cells and bone marrow cells, because they naturally have the highest rate of division. If the bone marrow, where blood is produced, is damaged, and the organ manages to heal, we then see leukemia, which, in principle, is the same as leukemia in the healing stage after bone cancer. DHS for bone cancer: "I am worthless." Strictly speaking, the symptoms of blood leukemia are nonspecific, not only in cancer but also in every healing of the bone marrow. The fact that hardly a single leukemia patient has survived is caused by the ignorance of doctors who conduct chemo- and/or radiation therapy while the existing bone marrow is weakened. This is the exact opposite of what is needed. In short, radiation is bad; it kills cells, but it does not create cancer; cancer can only be initiated by the brain through shock conflict (DHS). – And what about healthy food? – Healthy food that can prevent cancer is also nonsense. A healthy and well-nourished individual, human or animal, will naturally be less susceptible to all kinds of conflicts, for the rich, it is ten times less likely to get cancer than for the poor, because the rich can resolve many conflicts thanks to their checkbook. Strong, healthy animals get cancer less often than sick, old animals, which is of course in the nature of things; but the old are more susceptible to cancer not because of age; no, the animal is just weaker, like an old deer – weaker and therefore will be more easily expelled from its territory than a stronger and healthier young deer. – Dr. Hamer, what is the significance of pain in New Medicine? At present, it is considered a negative sign. – Yes, pain is a particularly difficult problem. We have different groups of pains: pain in the active stage of conflict, as in angina or stomach ulcer, and pain in the healing stage, which is caused by the formation of scar tissue. Pain in the active stage of conflict in angina disappears at the moment the conflict is resolved. This pain can also be alleviated psychologically. On the contrary, pain during healing is generally positive if the patient understands the connections and prepares themselves for the pain. Just as you prepare for a big job that you want to handle. Of course, everyone can choose to reduce pain with medications or external influences. In biological terms, pain experienced by humans and animals means that the entire organism is tuned for rest for optimal healing. For example, in bone cancer, stretching the upper layer in the healing stage is very painful;

Source: http://Source: kilubatra. https://oko-planet.su/phenomen/phenomenscience/22217-nepriznannaya-medicina.html